Unabashedly Prep

  • Patsy Pulitzer

    Style  

    Patsy Pulitzer shows how elegant blonde and cashmere can be. It is as timeless today as it was 55 years ago.

    Image via Slim Aarons

    Mar 31, 2010 | Permalink | (7) View Comments or Pen Your Own

    JMH left a comment on 4/2/2010 at 8:04 PM:

    Thanks Fred!


    F.E. Castleberry left a comment on 4/1/2010 at 1:10 PM:

    JMH—Traditionally, you broke out the whites between Memorial Day and Labor Day.  I feel seersucker and whites have more to do with an aura than a certain day.  Once spring kicks in and it’s 75 degrees outside, feel free to break out the whites before Memorial Day.  Hold off until summer for the seersucker though.


    meg left a comment on 4/1/2010 at 12:28 PM:

    love anything pulitzer.  liza went to my high school.


    JMH left a comment on 4/1/2010 at 9:12 AM:

    This picture reminds me of spring’s imminence (in the NE) and brings to mind a debate I have been having with some friends from Georgia.  What is the correct day to bring out the whites and the seersucker?  Is it Easter or Memorial Day?  Can you help me out Fred?


    Caron left a comment on 3/31/2010 at 8:19 PM:

    Timeless and stunning.  I forwarded this to a young woman who is Patsy circa 2010.  However, that sweater is definitely knit from Shetland wool.  Not something we see much of nowadays….


    K. Nights left a comment on 3/31/2010 at 7:25 PM:

    She is really beautiful.
    This is off topic, but do Rugby oxfords have a locker loop? I really like those.


    Christian Bourasseau left a comment on 3/31/2010 at 6:09 PM:

    She’s beautiful and elegant. I like how that sweater looks on her.


  • Blue Blood

    Dress Code  

    Photographed in New York, NY

    Mar 30, 2010 | Permalink | (26) View Comments or Pen Your Own

    TinsleyT left a comment on 4/30/2010 at 11:05 AM:

    Where do you get those shoes?


    Meg left a comment on 4/11/2010 at 11:32 AM:

    again, end this ridiculous ripped, torn, and frayed jean trend.  i hate it.  the birkin makes her outfit.  not digging the shoes much, either.


    gioforeal left a comment on 4/1/2010 at 11:27 PM:

    Oh,she look dope…I’d compliment her till she blushed if I ever met her.


    Rhonda left a comment on 3/31/2010 at 3:06 PM:

    Does she not have PERFECT hair?!?!  Wow.  I love the outfit, I am just waiting for that shoe trend to end. hate it.


    J Hall-Luper left a comment on 3/31/2010 at 2:16 AM:

    I spy a birkin. *Sigh*


    Robin left a comment on 3/30/2010 at 10:46 PM:

    With those jeans she could throw on a fashion scarf and something with owls on it and be a “quirky” hipster. Would have been much preppier without it. Everything else is wonderful though. She’s very photogenic and I’m jealous of her hair.


    F.E. Castleberry left a comment on 3/30/2010 at 9:16 PM:

    Karoline & Sophie—Her shoes are Aldo and blazer is by Rugby.


    Kev left a comment on 3/30/2010 at 8:59 PM:

    beautiful hair


    Karoline left a comment on 3/30/2010 at 8:30 PM:

    LOVE this look.  Where can I get the shoes?


    heatherlovesit left a comment on 3/30/2010 at 8:13 PM:

    i think she looks lovely.


    Michael B. left a comment on 3/30/2010 at 8:10 PM:

    Let the woman wear her ripped jeans! I like it, they giver her a bit of an edge. Just imagine how boring she would look if the rips hadn’t been there.


    sophie left a comment on 3/30/2010 at 7:51 PM:

    where can i get her shoes and blazer??


    Michael left a comment on 3/30/2010 at 5:06 PM:

    Love her hair, Love her Blazer, Love her shoes, Not loving her Jeans, not even a little!!


    pat furey left a comment on 3/30/2010 at 5:06 PM:

    when you’re that good looking, clothing matters much less. when you’re pretty and get it right? epic.

    diggin’ the shoes the most. just picked up a similar pair for men from cole haan on sale for $75.


    Connetiquette left a comment on 3/30/2010 at 4:18 PM:

    I want her fabulous hair


    S.N. Carpeaux left a comment on 3/30/2010 at 3:33 PM:

    I think she looks adorable. I’m a fan of the destroyed denim, having a pair I’m addicted to myself. The overall blue and reddish color palette of the photo is lovely.


    The Boss left a comment on 3/30/2010 at 2:46 PM:

    Forget her clothes. What is important here is her gorgeous locks—damn.


    Astrild left a comment on 3/30/2010 at 1:14 PM:

    What is with the ripped jeans thing, anyway? She’s not the first person I’ve seen with an otherwise great outfit who’s got giant holes in her jeans…


    Christian Bourasseau left a comment on 3/30/2010 at 12:25 PM:

    Everything’s perfect exeptfor the jeans, but that’s just me.


    bunny left a comment on 3/30/2010 at 12:19 PM:

    she looks so pulled together - the bag, the jacket the shirt. i actually like the jeans but not those shoes…on any woman ever. can’t wait for that trend to be over. really great hair too.


    MBR left a comment on 3/30/2010 at 12:18 PM:

    spotted on the steps of the met!
    the whole appeal of the outfit is twisting the classic blazer, and fun mens-inspired shoe with the denim. i love the look, this is how i wear it too. great photo!


    paige left a comment on 3/30/2010 at 12:13 PM:

    love those shoes. and jacket. just the whole outfit. although, i agree with everyone that the jeans throw off the whole appeal of the outfit a little. i soooo want those shoes….


    RWF left a comment on 3/30/2010 at 10:17 AM:

    I also cannot imagine why she would wear those horrible jeans with her cute blazer and kick ass shoes…....:(

    pleasurablerevelation.blogspot.com


    S left a comment on 3/30/2010 at 10:05 AM:

    As a fellow member of the fairer sex, I cannot understand what she was thinking. Everything works except for those ugly jeans. Obsessed with the shoes, though.


    Robdarko left a comment on 3/30/2010 at 9:57 AM:

    I totally agree with you, CLG23.  Very fetching but the jeans deter from an otherwise polished look.


    CLG23 left a comment on 3/30/2010 at 9:34 AM:

    My first thought of this picture was “awww”, I dont know why. But she is well put together. I’d just rather her wear non ripped jeans, though the rips are minimal. Nice footwear choice also!


  • Madras

    Style | Miscellany  

    If there is one fabric that is quintessentially Preppy, it’s Madras. True Madras, of course (patchwork madras screams go-to-hell even louder). The real thing is one of the oldest fabrics in the cotton trade, a fine, hand-loomed cotton that is imported from Madras, India. If you go looking for it on a map, it’s name to has been changed to Chennai. Interestingly enough, what sets true madras apart from imitations is that it “bleeds”; the murky colors-navy blue, maroon, mustard yellow-of its distinctive plaids are imparted by vegetable dyes that are guaranteed to run.

    Photographed in Wailuku, HI

    Since the colors are unstable at best, madras has to be treated very carefully. Shirts, shorts, and items that aren’t going to be dry-cleaned must be soaked in cold salt water for at least twenty-four hours before they’re washed for the first time. This sets the dyes. Then they should really be washed separately for months thereafter, because the colors will still run. Old madras takes on a lovely soft look and feel with many washings (the crux of the fabric’s appeal to Preps), though jackets, which are dry-cleaned, of course, maintain that sharp plaid.

    I began proselytizing the shorter inseam last summer. A recent sneak peek of Rugby's S/S 2011 collection only confirms the return of rising inseams (it also grants the appearance of additional height). These boast 5"—thanks to my tailor, Nam. When your oxford cloth boxers occasionally peek out, you've hit the sweet spot.

    Mar 29, 2010 | Permalink | (56) View Comments or Pen Your Own

    F.E. Castleberry left a comment on 5/7/2010 at 9:26 AM:

    @Drew—My glasses are Total Wits by Eye Bobs.


    Drew Poling left a comment on 4/15/2010 at 3:49 PM:

    Fred—great look.  Takes me back to the way we dressed in boarding school ca. 1979-82.

    Tell us, please: what make/model are your awesome glasses?


    Chznone left a comment on 4/5/2010 at 5:30 PM:

    If I had legs as great as yours, I’d shorten all my shorts as well. Love the Madras, Love the tennis shoes, and Love Love Love the blog….ignore the haters, and keep doing exactly what you’r doing….you have a fan in me


    mjl left a comment on 4/5/2010 at 8:52 AM:

    also, being a lifelong soccer player myself, i wish i had known about sambas coming in white.  its a well known fact, even outside the prep world, that white shoes make you look faster than the standard black ones.  not that i’d play any better with white kicks, i’d at least look a bit quicker.  anyone know if they make white Copas, too?


    Max left a comment on 4/5/2010 at 1:26 AM:

    Great job.  Looking effortless and comfortable- not too put together. Just perfect.


    anthony left a comment on 4/4/2010 at 3:12 PM:

    i like what fred’s got going on here. this relaxed look is perfect for the summer and doesn’t require a lot of effort while still maintaining a fun attitude. i especially like the color choices and the way they interact with the hawaiian foliage (along w/ the cool pickup truck in the background).

    to any backwoods southern frat boy hater—you literally have no idea what you’re talking about. KA and EX brothers think that they are the most stylish individuals on earth when they adorn chinos and either an orvis or patagonia sport shirt, neither of which fit properly. you have no idea how to create unique and interesting looks because you are prisoners of southern “tradition” and rigidity. if you want to learn how to actually embrace prep style and dress properly, look to the individuals that fred features on this blog.


    F.E. Castleberry left a comment on 4/4/2010 at 1:26 PM:

    MJL—You make a good point. I, in fact, do not need to rationalize or defend any content that I present here; however, I want to impart some degree of understanding.  It is understanding that makes you well dressed.  Style is you making visible your inner self and all of my responses below are centered around revealing that very truth.

    Everything here is provided to inspire all of you to know thyself…to increase your understanding of the ivy league style and your very own.  So take from it what you will (and let us all know about your comments). But the content is certainly not here to critique others’ style…or to pick them apart in order to make yourself appear bigger.  If you’re not inspired/informed by anything in a certain post, please hold your peace.

    If you do want to debate, I am more than happy to do so.  I believe the conversations that unfold (such as this Samba debate) stimulate thinking…and push us into a deeper awareness of ourselves.

    Thank you all for your readership…let’s continue to inspire each other, push each other and most of all, not take ourselves too seriously.


    mjl left a comment on 4/4/2010 at 8:08 AM:

    F.E. not sure why you’re feeling the need to defend yourself here.  this is, in fact, your blog that demonstrates what you feel to be the prep style.  do with it what you like, let others pass judgment and comment, but at no point do you need to reason, rationalize or defend your choice of clothing, shoes, accessories, etc.  you have a vision of what the prep style is about, so go and show your readers what it is.  looking forward to more great posts like this.


    F.E. Castleberry left a comment on 4/3/2010 at 7:21 PM:

    Rise Against…—I do not recall ever claiming that I’m creating new avant-garde looks.  The very fact that you observe that what I’m wearing here can easily be seen on any street corner in the South (and could have been for the better part of 10 years, save the updated fit) is a testament to exactly what I’m trying to do here.


    Ryan left a comment on 4/3/2010 at 7:07 PM:

    While I might find the shorts in this post a bit short for my taste that is neither here nor there; they’re fantastic madras shorts.

    Keep up the good work.


    Mike left a comment on 4/2/2010 at 4:51 PM:

    F.E—you know you have a successful blog when people are staying inside on this beautiful day (not to mention holiday weekend) and bashing your style. I propose that all opposition set up their own blog “Unabashedly Southern Prep” and lets compare and contrast the time and wisdom Mr. Castleberry injects into this site.

    Hang in there, and remember to apply your cynical-spray when you post your next entry!


    Jay H. left a comment on 4/2/2010 at 1:41 PM:

    I don’t believe that F.E. is trying to exciting or groundbreaking, he is just being him self and expressing it via fashion. And I respect him for it.


    rise against the growing tide of conformity left a comment on 4/2/2010 at 12:56 PM:

    Southern Gentry -

    Well Said, my friend. You are a man after my own heart.  It is so amusing to see how FE believes he is creating these new avant-garde looks from traditional pieces. Nothing is particularly exciting or groundbreaking about an oxford and madras shorts.  That can easily be seen on any street corner in the South, and could have been for the better part of 10 years.


    Jay H. left a comment on 4/2/2010 at 12:55 PM:

    Thank you! F.E. you said it best, “Style should inform others about who you are.” This is too true. I hate to see all these people that are trying to fit into the cookie-cutter shape of what someone who is original and creative looks like. And this tone of self-righteousness is the worst of all, thinking your better than people just because you know some other persons fashion. For example one person wrote, “i’m confused by people who visit a style blog but have no sense of style - or grace for that matter. are you all sitting at home in heinous basketball shorts? love this!” This is such a smug statement, I can’t stand it. Then there is the NB if F.E. was a southern frat boy then sure, but he isn’t he is someone who has played soccer for must of his life, so he wears sambas. You can’t just change your style to be like someone your not. It will never work, because you’re not that person.


    Robdarko left a comment on 4/2/2010 at 9:43 AM:

    F.E.  Castleberry, do you think you would have received the same reaction had you worn loafers or boat shoes?  Probably not. 

    Like I said earlier, you pulled this look off.

    P.S.  Country Os are my favorite.


    Margaret left a comment on 4/2/2010 at 1:43 AM:

    I do like the Sambas don’t get me wrong!  NBs might look awkward with the shorter inseam anyway.  To each his own!


    rhonda left a comment on 4/1/2010 at 4:52 PM:

    Love it! Classic.


    James left a comment on 4/1/2010 at 4:21 PM:

    I personally don’t like shorts that short (I’m a ‘just above the knee’ kinda guy + I’m 5’11) but the length on him hits the spot. As far as the NB vs Samba’s are concerned, I’m sure NB’s would look just as cool and casual but Samba’s are money here. Great job Jake.


    chad moore left a comment on 4/1/2010 at 4:17 PM:

    Why are there so many comments telling someone what to change about their style?  I don’t get it.  In this homogenized world we live in on so many levels it’s refreshing to not only see someone SHARE what they love and why, but it’s also nice to see someone standing up to the naysayers and holding their ground.  So, good on you Fred sir.  And anyone questioning the roots adidas has in fashion you might want to look up Y-3, adidas Originals, and SLVR.


    F.E. Castleberry left a comment on 4/1/2010 at 3:53 PM:

    Southern Gentry—I use the phrase “Hell no” because of the number of readers insisting I wear New Balance (who the hell are any of us to tell anyone what to wear when unsolicitied?). I am not insisting anything I wear is original. That would be an oxymoron, seeing as how I reach back to trad for much of my style. And absolutely you’re right, prepdom is absolutely free of passing trends.  I was simply pointing out Sambas’ relevance (because this is still fashion) by mentioning Michael Bastian’s recent use of them in his Gant collection. They’re having a moment possibly.

    Sambas are shoes I’ve worn throughout my childhood—they’re appropriate for my style (and when you think about it, it could be insulting when you suggest someone wear otherwise when you don’t understand the significance of why they wear what they do).  Sambas inform others of where I come from (a nod to sport). The patchwork tells everyone to go-to-hell while the OCBD anchors everything down in tradition. Style should inform others about who you are. This site is about encouraging preppys and ivy-leaguers to develop clearer voices through their personal style…and then sharing that with the fashion world (because we truly believe it is the best time-tested way to dress).


    Southern Gentry left a comment on 4/1/2010 at 3:19 PM:

    You lost some credibility with your catty remark about NB’s, F.E.  (HELL NO!...are we teenaged females?)  Prepdom should be free of passing trends.  However, you tout Michael Bastian’s work with Gant as a great reason to wear Samba’s?  They aren’t original either…sorry if that hurts your feelings.  Your audacity is amusing, though.  To think that anything you wear is ever really original?  Did companies stop making many of the same in order to turn a profit?


    jake left a comment on 4/1/2010 at 9:19 AM:

    You might want let up on the defensive responses to commentators, lest people think you’re just another queeny wannabe internet fashion stylist instead of what you truly are, just a regular socecr-playin’ dude who just happens to leave his shoes untied ‘cause that’s how guys are.


    Things Is Cool left a comment on 4/1/2010 at 2:52 AM:

    Maui madras looks good! Thanks for showing Hawai’i some love, F.E.


    F.E. Castleberry left a comment on 4/1/2010 at 12:35 AM:

    Ian—With the origins of the half-tuck rooted in polo players untucking their jerseys after matches, it is resistant to trends.

    Drew—Exactly what are the “awful white sneakers (untied)” telling of? That I’ve played soccer since my childhood and don’t care to tie my shoes?  Because that’s what I’m trying to say with them.

    For those of you suggesting New Balances in lieu of Adidas Sambas…HELL NO.  Are you aware of Michael Bastian’s most recent collection for Gant? Besides, Sambas are true to who I am. I’ve been playing soccer exclusively for 15 years.  Your style needs to be your own—not copied from some frat boy uniform in the south.


    Ian left a comment on 3/31/2010 at 9:49 PM:

    A classic look, but really, isn’t the the time of the half-tucked shirt over yet?


    Margaret left a comment on 3/31/2010 at 2:32 AM:

    Someone said something about switching the Adidas to NB, I personally would like that better and agree that’s something you definitely see in the south.


    heatherlovesit left a comment on 3/30/2010 at 8:18 PM:

    i’m confused by people who visit a style blog but have no sense of style - or grace for that matter. are you all sitting at home in heinous basketball shorts? love this!


    Jay H. left a comment on 3/30/2010 at 6:45 PM:

    Drew- “awful white sneakers”, are you kidding me! Adidas Sambas are classic, I have the same pair and I wear them all the time.


    Connetiquette left a comment on 3/30/2010 at 4:49 PM:

    Jake-
    And I quote,
    “Authentic India Madras
    The homespun qualities of authentic India Madras result in no two pieces being exactly the same and the imperfections found in this fabric give it the character and texture interest which is so desirable. Because of the indigo dye, you may wish to wash separately. The dyes will bleed over time.”
    So states the tag on a bleeding madras dress from Rugby Summer 2010. No it does not have skulls and yes I am familiar with Vampire Weekend’s reference.


    The Boss left a comment on 3/30/2010 at 2:42 PM:

    Madras are synonymous with Leona Lewis: they keep bleeding.


    S. M. Shewan left a comment on 3/30/2010 at 1:00 PM:

    Jake, the “washing instructions” aren’t (at least I don’t believe) intended to be taken as anything other than a reference to The Official Preppy Handbook.


    Drew left a comment on 3/30/2010 at 12:49 PM:

    The manufactured “half tuck” on the shirt, combined with those awful white sneakers (untied?) are very telling indeed.


    John left a comment on 3/30/2010 at 11:06 AM:

    If you go too short on the inseam, it’s not just the boxers that could peek out.


    Robdarko left a comment on 3/30/2010 at 10:00 AM:

    I require a 8” to 10” inseam but this kid can definitely pull it off.  Looks good!


    Jake left a comment on 3/30/2010 at 9:45 AM:

    Connetiquette—They have madras, not bleeding madras.  They may call it bleeding madras because they heard that vampire weekend song, but that doesn’t mean it’s gonna bleed. 

    Also, bleeding madras doesn’t come with little skulls all over it, but that’s another issue.


    Connetiquette left a comment on 3/30/2010 at 7:29 AM:

    Jake, Rugby has bleeding madras in store as we speak


    hillybilly left a comment on 3/30/2010 at 4:47 AM:

    like your leggs, dude’s


    F.E. Castleberry left a comment on 3/30/2010 at 2:16 AM:

    Jake—I’m not sure where you got your information but I purchased an authentic madras cumberbun last summer.


    Jake left a comment on 3/29/2010 at 11:41 PM:

    Nice shorts, but nobody’s made bleeding madras for several decades now, so your washing instructions are unnecessary (unless you’ve scored some new-old-stock, that is.)


    Southern Gentry left a comment on 3/29/2010 at 9:09 PM:

    Although I applaud the effort, this look made me chuckle. Switch the Adidas for NB’s and you have what southern fraternity men have been wearing for decades. I guess the “fashion gods” have deigned to “stylize” something that they themselves have mocked for years. Hint: for the coveted “pocket flash”, try Patagonia. They make a helluva short short.


    James left a comment on 3/29/2010 at 8:02 PM:

    I’ve been on the lookout for a short-sleeve madras button-down. Any suggestions?


    Christian Bourasseau left a comment on 3/29/2010 at 6:54 PM:

    Brilliant look.


    The Boss left a comment on 3/29/2010 at 6:13 PM:

    Fred—That’s interesting regarding your height. I was going to ask the same question before I clicked on the comment section. I always assumed (based on your photos) that you were shorter than that. Being 6’2” myself, I would think a 5” inseam would look ridiculous on me, but perhaps that’s because I’m used to 7-9” inseams.


    M.M. Gashlycrumb left a comment on 3/29/2010 at 5:19 PM:

    Where are those glasses from? They’re GREAT!
    Also, nice shorts


    J. Hall-Luper left a comment on 3/29/2010 at 4:59 PM:

    Oh, Straw Boater, what do you know. “Dudes” can wear whatever they please these days.

    Nevertheless, this is such a summer look I can get behind. Can’t wait. And I’ve boycotted shorts for the past 3 years, so its kind of a big deal.


    Michael E. left a comment on 3/29/2010 at 4:53 PM:

    Could you recommend a good source for bleeding madras?


    Andy left a comment on 3/29/2010 at 3:20 PM:

    With the arrival of shorter-shorts styles I suspect we’ll see a lot of arguments on what looks good and what doesn’t.  In the end it’s all subjective but it’s pulled off well in this picture.  I have some shorts in a similar pattern from A&F (it was my college phase) that I haven’t worn in ages due to their length but with some quick tailoring I may be set.


    CLG23 left a comment on 3/29/2010 at 3:10 PM:

    yep…is is definately a must for the spring/summer. The length is alittle iffy for me, right above the knew is my spot. Well done!


    F.E. Castleberry left a comment on 3/29/2010 at 2:56 PM:

    Mike—I’m about 6’.


    Michael left a comment on 3/29/2010 at 2:47 PM:

    Fred, you’re my hero.


    Connetiquette left a comment on 3/29/2010 at 2:44 PM:

    I give up. Flash your thighs all you want. wink


    Sam left a comment on 3/29/2010 at 2:42 PM:

    Hide those knees my man.


    Mike left a comment on 3/29/2010 at 2:34 PM:

    A personal favorite. I would love to see you analyze seersucker as well.

    Shorts are too short for me, but I applaud you for your bravery. How tall are you?


    Nicholas left a comment on 3/29/2010 at 1:45 PM:

    Short shorts are where it’s at. I’d go further than peeking boxers; peeking pockets are ideal. Ditch the specs and throw on some shades with croakies and you’re set.


    Straw Boater left a comment on 3/29/2010 at 1:42 PM:

    Gross.  Dudes should not wear shorts that short.


    Kyle Barnes left a comment on 3/29/2010 at 1:22 PM:

    digging the madras with white & gum samba pairing… I picked up those shoes last summer and had trouble wearing them with longer shorts but with the shorter inseams they hit the spot. Well Done Sir!


  • Fair Complexion

    Dress Code  

    Photographed in Dallas, TX

    Mar 26, 2010 | Permalink | (14) View Comments or Pen Your Own

    ste4ve left a comment on 4/12/2010 at 10:04 AM:

    At first glance, the pink band above the belt appears to be her stomach.  Not good.


    Randi left a comment on 3/29/2010 at 6:14 PM:

    The pants: cotton pincord trouser. The story on the dog: She is a frequent of Highland Park Village as much as any local shopper. I think this was the third time we had seen the pup in that one week.


    shawndb left a comment on 3/27/2010 at 11:19 AM:

    Love the look…and yes, Dallas can be a prep haven. Especially in Highland Park Village, where the Rugby store is located in that photo.


    Openzedoor left a comment on 3/26/2010 at 7:40 PM:

    What’s going on with that dog?

    www.openzedoor.blogspot.com


    CLG23 left a comment on 3/26/2010 at 2:48 PM:

    I am forever against those shoes..everything is nice. Are those pants linen?, but either way…good stuff aside from those “wedges”...I believe its the word that just turns me off haha but seriously


    bunny left a comment on 3/26/2010 at 2:06 PM:

    cutest dog evah! she just needs a sweater to match her mummy.


    F.E. Castleberry left a comment on 3/26/2010 at 12:43 PM:

    Sir Greg—Welcome to Unabashedly Prep. I do travel a bit and have my camera with me most of the time. I believe her trousers are a cotton pincord.


    Sir Greg left a comment on 3/26/2010 at 11:33 AM:

    Hey, do you travel all over taking photos (I see different locations on ever other picture) I am new to the website btw. As far as the picture goes love the pants and the blazer. The pants are linen correct?


    RWF left a comment on 3/26/2010 at 11:21 AM:

    I keep seeing so many great pictures from Dallas….if this keeps up I’m moving down smile

    pleasurablerevelation.blogspot.com


    Andrew left a comment on 3/26/2010 at 9:47 AM:

    I absolutely adore the trouser that she is wearing, and the menswear inspired blazer.  Very classic.


    Christian Bourasseau left a comment on 3/26/2010 at 9:35 AM:

    Brilliant. Love the espadrilles, the trousers and the maltese. Everything!


    KFad left a comment on 3/26/2010 at 9:26 AM:

    Time for the ladies to break out the espadrilles.


    hope left a comment on 3/26/2010 at 9:23 AM:

    not a fan of those shoes with the outfit.


    anthony left a comment on 3/26/2010 at 9:14 AM:

    well done. i’m guessing the pants are seersucker and i like how you paired them with fair isle. very cool.


  • Just Visit

    Miscellany  

    Mar 25, 2010 | Permalink | (3) View Comments or Pen Your Own

    Randi left a comment on 3/29/2010 at 6:10 PM:

    Love her. Love her style. Love what she is about. Love everything about her. Willing to go where no woman had been before.


    Arnold left a comment on 3/26/2010 at 4:40 AM:

    that’s why i don’t wanna get married


    Koen left a comment on 3/25/2010 at 6:06 PM:

    Haha, it’s true. A lifetime together is way too long.


    • Older Posts

  • About
  • THIS ENTIRE SITE Ⓒ 2010 UNABASHEDLY PREP. ALL OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS HEREIN (DENOTED BY "PHOTOGRAPHED IN... ") ARE COPYRIGHTED BY THE PHOTOGRAPHER. IMAGES (DENOTED BY "IMAGES VIA...") ARE READILY AVAILABLE IN VARIOUS PLACES ON THE INTERNET AND BELIEVED TO BE IN PUBLIC DOMAIN. IMAGES POSTED ARE BELIEVED TO BE POSTED WITHIN OUR RIGHTS ACCORDING TO THE U.S. COPYRIGHT FAIR USE ACT (TITLE 17, U.S. CODE). NO PART OF THIS SITE, OR ANY OF THE CONTENT CONTAINED HEREIN, MAY BE USED OR REPRODUCED IN ANY MANNER WHATSOEVER WITHOUT EXPRESS PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER(S).